Open Members’ Meeting | Collaboration in Grantmaking | 25 March 2025

On 25 March, Scottish Grantmakers hosted its first Open Members’ Meeting of the year. The theme of the meeting was ‘Collaboration in Grantmaking’. Collaboration has emerged as a common theme for grantmakers in recent months. SGM Members noted the increased pressures on both applicants and decision makers, as well as the finite resources, both financial and administrative, available to ensure positive outcomes.

Present:

  • Tom Baughan, Corra Foundation

  • Laura Bertie, The Northwood Charitable Trust

  • Matthew Bruce, SGM Assistant Co-ordinator | The WS Society

  • Anthony Cox, The Christina Mary Hendrie Charitable Trust

  • Brynley Davies, The William Syson Foundation

  • Jo Elliot, SGM Trustee | Binks Trust

  • Nicholas Ferguson CBE, SGM Trustee | The Kilfinan Trust

  • Hannah Garrow, The Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland

  • Steven Greig, The Gannochy Trust

  • Emma Maher, Artemis Charitable Foundation

Panel:

  • Tom Baughan, Panel Chair | SGM Trustee | Corra Foundation

  • Brynley Davies, The William Syson Foundation

  • Steven Greig, The Gannochy Trust

  • Mhairi Reid, The William Grant Foundation


  • Clare McNally, Hillcrest Foundation

  • Sophie Mills WS, SGM Co-ordinator | The WS Society

  • Calum Mitchell, The Fyrish Foundation CIO

  • Stewart Murdoch, The Alexander Moncur Trust

  • Morgag Neville, The Northwood Charitable Trust

  • Mary Porter, KPE4

  • Mhairi Reid, The William Grant Foundation

  • Fiona Russell, The Gannochy Trust

  • David Sinclair, The National Lottery Community Fund

  • Claire Stone, The Newark Trust

  • Blair Thomson, SGM Trustee | The Northwood Charitable Trust

  • Ailsa Watson, Future Woodlands Scotland

  • Karen Wright, Fife Health Charity / NHS Fife

A recording of the panel discussion is available below:

Steven Greig - The Gannochy Trust

Steven opened the meeting with a presentation on The Gannochy Trust’s third sector youth work. For decades, Perth and Kinross Council and The Gannochy Trust have been key local funders for third sector youth work agencies.  Youth work agencies were competitors for the same funding. Organisations were facing:

  • Short term funding

  • Multiple applications

  • Multiple reporting formats

  • Limited incentive for organisations to plan with each other

  • Short term staffing contracts

  • Hand to mouth existence was a threat to sustainability

  • Little collaboration

At the same time membership of youth groups in Perth and Kinross was facing a steady decline. To break the cycle, The Gannochy Trust and Perth and Kinross Council formed a partnership in 2018 to combine existing funding to offer third sector youth work providers five-year contracts across each of the five localities of Perth and Kinross. The intention was that The Gannochy Trust would achieve some collaboration that would deliver more than the sum of its parts.

The Gannochy trust has prioritised working with beneficiaries to improve the way funds are used by building trusted relationships, allowing organisations time to develop, sharing resources, staff and training, securing funding from multiple sources. This has led to local youth clubs doubling the area they cover, increasing their staff and volunteers, doubling the number of young people supported in the area and supporting the wider third sector.

Steven reflected on the positive impact collaboration has had on the youth work sector in Perth and Kinross, with it bringing about greater knowledge, shared skills and resources and access to additional funding that would not otherwise exist. From a steady decline, the membership of youth clubs had soared to double its previous high in 2006.

A key take away was that the amount of funding had not changed in six years. Growth was the result of funding security that built relationships, trust and enabled collaboration.

The University of Dundee has evaluated The Gannochy Trust’s collaborative approach and concluded that:

“The culture has changed from competition to collaboration, support and encouragement, underpinned by a can-do attitude.  Membership has provided stability, enabling a focus on delivering quality provision rather than on survival.”

Brynley Davies - The William Syson Foundation

Brynley began by explaining the work of the William Syson Foundation. With a £13 million endowment, it provides £500,000 of grants per year for the arts. Brynley presented a current pilot project being undertaken by the Foundation to increase the number of school visits to Scottish galleries which resulted from dialogue with galleries themselves. The Foundation is working with Aberdeen City Gallery, the National Galleries in Edinburgh and the Kelvingrove Gallery in Glasgow.

£25,000 has been awarded to each gallery as part of the pilot. Galleries are sharing data amongst themselves and the Foundation is promoting the work of freelance educators, coach hire and staffing, with the aim of reducing the administrative burden on art teachers.

The project has the potential reach thousands of pupils in Scotland and the Foundation wants to engage with more funders to ensure the project is able to reach as many pupils as possible.

Brynley considered the tools available to funders to begin collaboration:

  • Networks such as SCVO, Scottish Grantmakers’ events and the annual Gathering.

  • Funders Hub

  • The Art Funders Group

  • Individual organisations with a shared interest

  • 360 Giving

Collaboration using existing networks has the benefit of widening impact and ensuring the focus of funding activities remains on supporting recipients.

Mhairi Reid - The William Grant Foundation

Mhairi outlined the William Grant Foundation’s proactive management of its funds, with the aim of investing £4 million per year in Scotland, with a broad range of themes and causes supported. Mhairi considered collaboration to be a very good thing with it underpinning the work of the Foundation.

As a relatively new grantmaking organisation, Mhairi presented the methods used to enable collaboration:

  • ‘Piggybacking’ on the learning of others

  • Open and ongoing dialogue with other grantmakers

  • Reaching out for support or to ask questions

  • ‘Re-granting’ to other specialist funders to ensure awards are made with the correct level of expertise. 17% of the Foundation’s funds are spent by others

  • If expertise is required work with those involved in a target area

Mhairi reflected on positive and well established collaborative funds already in operation. One being Corra’s Human Rights Fund which has allowed for broader impact and learning for the William Grant Foundation with reduced costs. The Regenerative Futures Fund has also allowed for ‘riskier’ work to be taken on. Sharing burdens has been a very positive outcome for the grantmakers involved as well as allowing funds to reach smaller, unconstituted groups.

Members’ Discussion

Following diverse panel contributions, Members had a wide-ranging discussion on collaboration - with contacts even being exchanged with the hope of working together! It was agreed that all parties needed to be on the same page and to ensure that a clear goal was set for multiple parties to reach. Funders should be aware of the strategic needs of organisations and be willing to be flexible with time and resources.

It was noted that collaboration does not need to be an onerous or expensive undertaking, with good collaborative work being carried out over email, Zoom or Teams.

Useful Links:

Next
Next

Grantmaking 101 | In Partnership with Scotland Funders’ Forum | 25 February 2025